Was Bihar elections match fixing between Modi and Lalu?

Was Bihar election fixed and so UP-Bengal will also be fixed?
There is so much hype about Narendra Modi and Amit Shah's only second defeat among all 8 to 9 elections held in two years. It was like Australia winning series but loosing last game and media declaring Australia as looser.
But here my point is not to point out biased media. My point is about match fixing between Narendra Modi and Lalu Prasad Yadav. Surprised or shocked? Me too when this point came in my mind but when I started thinking on this line my mind became clear about this. Here is why it was fixed:
1. It is well known fact that Modi doesnt forgive political enemy easily and Nitish was his strong enemy. Modi focused on Lalu rather than Nitish so Lalu gained from it.
2. It might be decided between Modi and Lalu that in Loksabha Modi would gain and in assembly Lalu will gain.
3. It could be clandestine treaty. Because both can not publically join hands keeping in mind their vote banks.
4. In assembly elections, Lalu has gained bigger. His party was third in last elections. Now His party is largest. Nitish whose party in last election was largest is now gone to second no.
5. Now till 2019 due to Tejasvi and Tejpratap Nitish will be busy to handle RJD sons and other members. Scams and crimes will  come out and their 'sushashan' will be exposed.
6. If BJP had made mind it could have option to go court and cancel Lalu's bail. Why didnt it?
7. Modi has always maintained good relations with Lalu. When before Loksabha elections Lalu met with accident, Modi was first person to call him and wish him quick recovery.
8. In Bihar BJP there were many opponents of Modi starting from Sushil Modi to Shatrughna Sinha. Now on name of defeat all will be sidelined. Thus in next assembly  elections, team will be totally pro Modi.
And now one more shock! You will see same things in UP and West Bengal because Modi has match fixing with Mulayam and Mamata Banerjee also. Barring five seats all UP seats were captured by BJP. So in assembly elections Modi will let Mulayam win. And in West Bengal Modi had said in public rally during Loksabha campaign: Mamatajee, you rule in Bengal and let me rule at center.
One may question why Modi would choose to get defame by loosing assembly elections? Because it is better than getting defame for not fulfilling promises. If Modi looses all these elections he will have excuse of absence of majority in Rajya Sabha. And he can ask fresh mandate in next Loksabha elections!

What would have been reactions in Bharat if single terrorist attack had happened?

(1) Mein Deepak Chorasia football stadium se....yahan rashtrapti ko rawana kar diya gaya hai
(2) Barkha Dutt- Buck stops here. lekin abhi bhi kayee log  yahan maujud hai. yahan security pukhta nahi hai.
(3) Arnab Goswami- Nation wants to know- Rashtrapati ki jaan bacha ke modi ne galat kiya hai....aam aadmi ki jaan kyun nahin bachayee..
(4) Digvijay Singh- Ye sab Narendra Modijee ki hinduwadi neeti o ka parinam hai
(5) Arvind Kejriwal- We were constantly asking that Police control should be in our hands
(6) Shobha De- I have said at time of Dadri incident that I would eat beef but this time I am not going to say I am going to draw a  cartoon on Muhammad Pygamber
(7) Akhilesh Yadav- Hum police karyavahi mein mare gaye logo ke liye 45 lakh rupai ki sahayta ghoshit karte hai
(8) Lalu Prasad Yadav-Ye attack Modi ne hee karvaya hai
(9) Shahrukh Khan- There is intolerance.
(10) Nayantara Sehgal- There is intolerance.
(11) Ashok Vajpayee- ditto
(12) Raghuram Rajan and Moodies- Now no will invest in Bharat.
(13) Sudheendra Kulkarni- I will organise ISIS's head's book release function.
(14) Manishankar Aiyer- Please help ISIS in dethroning Narendra Modi
(15) Sonia Gandhi- Hum A-Sahe-Snu-Ta sahan barr-dashta nahi karrengay. We are with those who have been killing in fight with police.
(16) Punya Prasoon Bajpai- ek sach ye bhi hai - Is waqt mare gaye terrorist ke parivar ke zehan mein kya chal raha hai, is daur mein kaun jaan sakta hai

एनडीए की 2014 में बिहार में जीत और 2015 में हार, ये है कारण

1. 2014 में भाजप-रामविलास पासवान-कुशवाहा का गठबंधन था, सामने नीतीश, लालु, कॉंग्रेस अलग-अलग थे
2. 2014 में प्रजा कॉंग्रेस के शासन से अति त्रस्त थी। लेकिन बिहार में नीतीश के सुशासन से नाराज नहीं थी। लेकिन चूं कि नीतीश केन्द्र में सरकार नहीं बना सकते थे इस लिए उन्होने भाजप को मत दिया।
3. 2015 में नीतीश-लालु-कॉंग्रेस एक हो गये। उनके वोट नहीं बंटे।
4. 2015 में भाजप ने जीतनराम मांझी का साथ लिया। जिस तरह गुजरात की जनताने भाजप के साथ सत्ता के लिए द्रोह करने वाले शंकरसिंह-कॉंग्रेस को हराया वैसे बिहार की जनता मांझी के नीतीस द्रोह से नाराझ थी।
5. 2014 में नरेन्र मोदी के मिडिया स्ट्रेटेजिस्ट रहे प्रशांत किशोर को 2015 में नीतीशकुमारने अपने पास बुला लिया।
6. नरेन्द्र मोदी दिल्लीवाली गलती फिर से दोहरा गये। जिस तरह कॉंग्रेस उन पे व्यक्तिगत हमला करती थी और वो गुजरात में हरदम जितते थे वैसे उन्होने और भाजपने 2014 में केजरीवाल पे व्यक्तिगत प्रहार किये। 2015 में भी उन्होने नीतीश पे प्रहार किये। लालु पे प्रहार से कोई फर्क नहीं पडा लेकिन नीतीश की छबि काफी स्वच्छ है। इसी लिए जनताने ये बरदास्त नहीं किया।
7. ये लडाई मोदी वर्सिस ओल जैसी हो गई। इसमें लालु-नीतीश के अलावा साहित्यकार, फिल्मकार, इतिहासकार, वैज्ञानिक सभी कूद पडे। यहां तक कि शाहरुख खान भी। मोदी के समर्थन में ये सभी क्षेत्र के लोग आये लेकिन तब जब परिणाम को आने में एक ही दिन बाकी था। चुनाव के वक्त इन समर्थको को आ जाना चाहिए था।
8. दाल की महंगाई भारी पड गई।
9. दादरी कांड से ज्यादा हरियाणा में दलित हत्या भाजप के लिए नुकसानदेह साबित हुई। दलित हत्या को मिडिया ने जमकर कवरेज दिया। और उस पे वी. के. सिंह मिडिया के ट्रेप में आ गये। मिडिया का बहोत बडा वर्ग मोदी शासन के विरुद्ध था और रहेगा।
10. अपने भी विरुद्ध थे। अडवाणी खेमा पूरी तरह से मोदी का अश्वमेघ रथ बिहार में फिर से रूके एसा कर रहे थे। अडवाणी, अरुण शौरी, शत्रुघ्नसिंहा, सुधीन्द्र कुलकर्णी, सुशील मोदी आदि सबने कहीं ना कहीं ये चाहा कि बिहार में या पराजय हो या कम सीट मिले।
संघ के सरसंघचालक मोहन भागवत के इन्टरव्यू को ट्विस्ट कर के मिडिया में पेश किया गया। लालु-नीतीश ने इस का जम के फायदा उठाया। मोदी को इस की सफाई देते देते नाक में दम आ गया । मोदी अपने गुजरात में ही हार्दिक पटेल के नेतृत्व में पटेल अनामत आंदोलन हुआ। जो कथित तौर पे अरविंद केजरीवाल और  कॉंग्रेस के ईशारो पे हुआ। हार्दिक पटेलने गुजरात के विकास मोडल के विरोध किया जिस से विरोधीओ को मौका मिल गया।

News Channel analysis: If Ram would have been defeated...!

Today is result day for #BiharElections. Results or say trends are out. And MahaGathbandhan has swept Bihar elections. On every news channel analysis is going on in full swing. And as they say, all praise that who wins and criticize defeated person. Narendra Modi and Amit Shah are criticized in all possible manner.

A funny thought came in my mind: what would have happened with Shree Ram, our Ishwar, if he would have been defeated by Ravan? Possible analysis of his defeat by our today's news channel expert analyzers.  and disclaimer: This analysis is of News channels type who have started praised NDA in monring when it was ahead with double seats and suddenly started criticizing it. There is intention to hurt anyone's feelings.

1. Shree Ram should not have given up power even though his mother had asked for his vanvaas. Power is every thing and with power you can do good things. His mother was not right in her place. Her demand was unjust and unfair.

2. Shree Ram should not have taken his wife Seeta with him. If seeta would not be there, her kidnapping would not have been happened and so war would not have taken place.  So there was no question of Ram's defeat.

3. Shree Ram didn't follow his father's advice that he should live in near by area to Ayodhya.

4. Shree Ram should not have killed Khar-Dushan, which were brothers of Ravan. Shree Ram invited enmity with Ravan by killing his brothers. (Analyzer conveniently forgets sins of Khar-Dushan.)

5. Shree Ram should have respected a lady Suparnkha. But he ordered to deform her by cutting her nose and ear. This made Ravan angry and that's why he kidnapped Seeta Maata. Otherwise he respected women a lot. (Analyzer conveniently forgets character or charitra of Suparnkha. She tried to seduce Ram and Laxman who were married persons.)

6. Shree Ram should not have sent Hanumanjee as emissary. Hanumanjee burnt Lanka without any reason. He killed so many innocent men, women and children of Lanka. (Analyzer conveniently forgets that Ravan tried to burn Hanumanjee's tail.)

7. Shree Ram should not have taken Vibhishan by his side. Due that he encouraged defaction.Vibhishan was not of any use for Shree Ram. He always misled and misinformed Ram.

and final one.

8. Now due this defeat, Shree Ram has lost claim to rule Ayodhya. 

Shahrukh Khan's interview in 2013 when Bharat was tolerant

When in 2013, Sonia Gandhi remote controlled UPA government was ruling, there were many cases of intolerance. All Girl band Pragassh was banned (read here: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/feb/05/kashmir-all-female-rock-group-disband) , Kamal Hassan's film 'Vishwaroopam' was banned due to protest from muslims, CNN IBN (when secular Rajdeep Sardesai was its head) anchor asked Shahrukh Khan @iamsrk about rising intolerance.

He just avoided it by saying that I am actor. When anchor further pushed Shahrukh Khan for speaking all girls band which was targetted by Kashmiri muslim fanatics, he just said I don't want to have specific  chatter and talk about things which are religious and politics. So you can talk to me about my films. Generically I would say that yes, I am artist and I support freedom of expression.

Anchor again pushed Shahrukh Khan to say about intolerance but Shahrukh Khan diplomatically again avoided question by saying I speak about work that I know better.

You can see video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-5ZrYMbaaI