Why Ravish Kumar suddenly became wise and realised fault of news anchors?

Watch this video and try to understand why Ravish Kumar suddenly started realising they news anchors are doing something wrong.

Until now Ravish Kumar @ravishndtv and @ndtv had no problem against tv news channels. Until they had no problem against shouting of Arnab Goswami. Until now they were not ready to wait for court judgement in 2002 Gujarat riots and fake encounter cases in Gujarat. They were constantly running and raising these issues even after court judgements declarin Narendra Modi innocent. Untill now Rajdeep Sardesai (who was once part of NDtv), Barkha Dutt, were not ready to let RSS, BJP, VHP spokespersons speak fully. But as JNU case exposed them, as some news channels and anchors like Arnab Goswami turning against anti national they have started fighting now in open. It is no hidden fact that NDTv owner Prannoy Roy's saali is Vrinda Karat leftist leader. Shame on NDTV, Barkha Dutt, Punya Prasoon Bajpai, Rajdeep Sardesai and Anjana Om Kashyap.

https://youtu.be/oLnF5YSOghg

Why Indian traditional media loosing out credibility fast?

There is no doubt Indian traditional media (Newspapers and magazines) were/are established/funded by and for Britishers and (then) black Britishers i.e. Congress and its allies. RSS/BJP/VHP had and has no guts to start its media. It is also true that they are arrogant enough to believe that they have their own sampark system (which they are loosing out fast as leaders and pracharaks now meet common workers or swayamsewaks less than before) so they don't need any media. They adopted Prasidhdhi Parangmukhta Sidhdhant.

So from very beginning, first in British rule and then in Congress rule stretched to 65 years, media created RSS/BJP/VHP image as Brahminwadi, dalit virodhi, feudalistic, anti reservation, Gandhi killer, militant, karmakandwadi, anti progress and conservative. Even till now, RSS/BJP/VHP are not able to change this image.

But on the other hand, it is also true that Sangh/BJP/VHP's sampark padhdhati worked well until some years back as leaders and pracharaks maintained contact with ground workers. So impression about these organisations changed some how in common people. At the same time traditional media (in which 24 hours running channels were added and its editors and journalists coming from print media were mainly pro Congress) continued to be anti RSS/BJP/VHP. But after 2005, use of social media changed dimension. Now Facebook, Twitter, news websites and youtube were there. So   leaders like L K Advani, Narendra Modi recognized its importance as early as in 2008 and started blogging, their websites and twitter handles were updated as and when their rallies started. They started posting their images and news on internet. So common people now got connected with them directly. If channels and print media were not giving coverage to their rallies, they got live telecast through webcast.

Also for starting website or blog, one did not need to get central government's permission or licence which was needed for print media/tv media, so many neutral or  pro RSS/BJP/VHP websites got started. They started putting their views on it. It also changed perception in common Bharatiya's mind that RSS/BJP/VHP is anti technology and conservative. Instead youth got connected with RSS/BJP/VHP more than Congress. Second, due to social media, traditional media  (print media and tv channels) started getting exposed. Also print media and tv channels' editors and journalists like Rajdeep Sardesai, Barkha Dutt, Anjana Om Kashyap, Punya Prasoon Bajpai joined Facebook and Twitters. Tagging facilities on these both sites got them trapped in questions and word battles where they had no answers to defend their pro Congress and anti RSS/BJP/VHP stand. Even Rajdeep Sardesai like journos had to quit twitter (however he is now back). But they termed this questioning and getting exposed as 'intolerance'.

People now can search facts ranging from ancient history to modern age, from Nehru to Modi. So image of Nehru and other Congress leaders began to diminish. Truth started coming out. This was also one of the factors behind victory of Narendra Modi in Lok Sabha elections 2014 who faced worst ever intolerance from these traditional media. So it seems pro Congress journalists are loosing fast. They are facing wrath of common people for running pro Congress news or for suppressing facts that go against Congress and its allies or for trying to tarnish RSS/BJP/VHP image or for suppressing good moves by RSS/BJP/VHP. They are so much anti RSS/BJP/VHP that to oppose them they sometime take anti national and pro Pakistan stand (like we saw in Yakub Memon's execution). So it is time to retrospect for traditional media and pro Congress journalists.

What would have been reactions in Bharat if single terrorist attack had happened?

(1) Mein Deepak Chorasia football stadium se....yahan rashtrapti ko rawana kar diya gaya hai
(2) Barkha Dutt- Buck stops here. lekin abhi bhi kayee log  yahan maujud hai. yahan security pukhta nahi hai.
(3) Arnab Goswami- Nation wants to know- Rashtrapati ki jaan bacha ke modi ne galat kiya hai....aam aadmi ki jaan kyun nahin bachayee..
(4) Digvijay Singh- Ye sab Narendra Modijee ki hinduwadi neeti o ka parinam hai
(5) Arvind Kejriwal- We were constantly asking that Police control should be in our hands
(6) Shobha De- I have said at time of Dadri incident that I would eat beef but this time I am not going to say I am going to draw a  cartoon on Muhammad Pygamber
(7) Akhilesh Yadav- Hum police karyavahi mein mare gaye logo ke liye 45 lakh rupai ki sahayta ghoshit karte hai
(8) Lalu Prasad Yadav-Ye attack Modi ne hee karvaya hai
(9) Shahrukh Khan- There is intolerance.
(10) Nayantara Sehgal- There is intolerance.
(11) Ashok Vajpayee- ditto
(12) Raghuram Rajan and Moodies- Now no will invest in Bharat.
(13) Sudheendra Kulkarni- I will organise ISIS's head's book release function.
(14) Manishankar Aiyer- Please help ISIS in dethroning Narendra Modi
(15) Sonia Gandhi- Hum A-Sahe-Snu-Ta sahan barr-dashta nahi karrengay. We are with those who have been killing in fight with police.
(16) Punya Prasoon Bajpai- ek sach ye bhi hai - Is waqt mare gaye terrorist ke parivar ke zehan mein kya chal raha hai, is daur mein kaun jaan sakta hai

Review of Sholay by Shree #AK49:

Once AK-49 went to watch Sholay film. After watching film someone asked him: who is big thief? Big dacoit? He said : Jay-Veeru!

He explained logic: Surma Bhpoli ne ghoshit kiya hai ki Jay and Veeru pakke aur chhate badmash hai. And look how Thakur joined with them. How Jay-Veeru fool villagers.They wear jeans. They ride scooter in age of tanga. One of them is drunkard. The other has affair with widow. Lover of Veeru inspires Ahmed Miyan, one of few muslims of village to go out of village so that dacoits can kill him. Thakur had no plan to save villagers but only to revenge killing of his own family members and cutting of his hands. Thakur was exploiting his servant called Ramlal. Jay and Veeru celebrate only festival of holi and not eid.
Then AK-49 was asked: what is your opinion about Gabbar Sinh? Dont you find him cruel, robber and having bad manners (spitting here and there)?
AK said: Not at all. He was just like us-aam aadmi. He had habit like our Bharti-spitting here and there. Jay Somnath.
Gabbar wears just one or two pairs of cloth like me. He has no home and lives on fund from villagers like I depend upon fund. They use horse as mode of travelling. Gabbar had Sambha who used to be PRO of him. Sambha used to go and stick posters of reward of 50000. I have two Sambhas. Ashutosh and Punya Prasoon. Gabbar used to abuse every body with Suvvar ke bachchon. I also abuse everybody who is against me. That's why I like Gabbar. Like he cut hands of Thakur, I also want to.....